Connect with us

Technology

Researchers Develop Sustainable Construction Material Using Cardboard

Editorial

Published

on

A team of researchers at RMIT University in Australia has developed a groundbreaking construction material that combines soil, water, and cardboard, presenting a sustainable alternative to conventional building methods. Known as cardboard-confined rammed earth (CCRE), this innovative approach aims to address the environmental impact of traditional construction materials, particularly concrete, which contributes approximately 8% of global carbon emissions annually.

The traditional construction industry generates significant waste, with Australia alone disposing of over 2.2 million tons of cardboard and paper in landfills each year. By utilizing cardboard tubes as permanent casings in the construction process, the RMIT team has created a method that not only repurposes waste but also reduces the reliance on environmentally damaging materials.

Revolutionizing Sustainable Building

The concept behind CCRE is elegantly simple. Instead of using typical formwork that is removed post-construction, builders employ cardboard tubes that remain in place. These tubes confine and strengthen the moistened soil compacted within, akin to a supportive sleeve that enhances the structural integrity of the core material.

Dr. Jiaming Ma, the lead researcher, highlights that while modern rammed earth construction often incorporates cement for added strength, this is unnecessary with the thick walls produced by this method. By replacing cement with cardboard, the team has achieved a material with just one quarter of the carbon footprint of concrete, and at a cost of less than one third that of traditional materials. A full-size CCRE column emits only 17.41 kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalent, compared to 77.95 kilograms for standard concrete.

The accessibility of the CCRE process is another significant advantage. Construction teams can produce the material directly on-site by compacting local soil and water mixtures inside the cardboard tubes. This approach reduces the need to transport heavy materials such as bricks and steel, making it particularly advantageous for construction in remote areas where suitable soil is readily available.

Strength and Sustainability

Concerns regarding the strength of cardboard as a structural material are addressed by the research team’s innovative formula, which predicts the material’s durability based on the cardboard’s thickness. Following a drying period of 28 days, compression tests indicate that CCRE matches the strength of conventional cement-stabilized rammed earth. While it may not rival standard concrete in strength, it is sufficiently robust for load-bearing applications in low-rise buildings.

Another notable benefit of rammed earth construction is its natural ability to regulate indoor temperature and humidity due to high thermal mass, making it well-suited for warmer climates. This characteristic can significantly reduce reliance on mechanical cooling, leading to lower energy consumption and further diminishing carbon emissions.

The RMIT team envisions CCRE as an ideal solution for low-rise housing, community structures, and off-grid projects. This method aligns with a global trend toward earth-based construction that prioritizes sustainability and local material use, driven by net-zero goals.

As the team seeks industry partners to scale up the application of CCRE, this innovation demonstrates how transforming waste into building materials can offer a greener, more cost-effective alternative to traditional construction practices. Through a fresh perspective on established techniques, they illustrate that sustainable building solutions can emerge from simple, accessible components.

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.