Connect with us

Top Stories

Haisla Nation Opposes Alberta’s Pipeline Push in Urgent Meeting

Editorial

Published

on

UPDATE: A crucial meeting on November 25, 2023, between B.C.’s Haisla Nation, the District of Kitimat, and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has intensified the debate over oil export proposals on B.C.’s North Coast. Local leaders presented starkly different views on future energy development, with the Haisla Nation firmly opposing oil pipelines while Kitimat took a more neutral stance.

In a joint statement, both communities celebrated their history of successful resource projects. However, the Haisla Nation reaffirmed its rejection of any oil pipeline or export facilities in its territory, a position it has held for over a decade. “We will never allow oil tankers on our coast,” stated Marilyn Slett, president of the Coastal First Nations-Great Bear Initiative. The Haisla’s opposition echoes strong sentiments first expressed during the contentious Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline debate.

Kitimat Mayor Phil Germuth emphasized that while the District is not dismissing future proposals outright, any new project must align with environmental and community standards. “I’m not going to say anything is off the table,” Germuth remarked. However, he added, “If someone was to just dust off the old Northern Gateway and put that on the table, you’re probably going to get the same ‘no’ you had last time.”

The meeting, described by Germuth as a long-planned discussion unrelated to Alberta’s current pipeline proposal, focused on alternative collaborations, such as transporting goods like food products and ammonia through Kitimat. “We didn’t discuss any pipelines, but talked about everything else we might be able to do together,” he said.

Alberta’s government is pushing to expedite a new pipeline proposal to facilitate oil exports through B.C. ports, aiming to alleviate Canada’s reliance on U.S. markets. Recently, Alberta allocated $14 million for early-stage planning of this project, which may require expanding port facilities in Kitimat or Prince Rupert. This initiative includes a potential repeal of the federal Oil Tanker Moratorium Act, which currently restricts large crude oil tankers from the region.

As speculation grows, Prime Minister Mark Carney is expected to visit Calgary on November 27, raising expectations of a formal agreement on the proposed memorandum of understanding (MOU) between Alberta and Ottawa. The B.C. government has criticized the federal process, claiming it has excluded affected communities from discussions.

Premier David Eby has previously dismissed Alberta’s proposal as lacking a viable route and local legitimacy, labeling it “not a real project.” He has raised concerns regarding Indigenous rights and environmental protections, which remain hot-button issues in the region.

For many in B.C., the current pipeline discussions echo the divisive debates surrounding the Northern Gateway project, which aimed to transport 525,000 barrels of diluted bitumen daily from Bruderheim, Alberta, to Kitimat. The project faced significant opposition and was ultimately overturned in 2016 due to inadequate consultation with Indigenous communities. A plebiscite in Kitimat during 2014 showed that a majority of residents opposed Northern Gateway, a sentiment that continues to resurface as tensions rise over the new Alberta-Ottawa MOU.

Despite keeping options open, Mayor Germuth stressed that any future proposals would need to meet stringent environmental criteria and provide clear benefits to the local community. “We’re as concerned and protective of our environment as anyone else,” he stated. “But what is that? I don’t know.”

The situation remains fluid as local leaders and residents grapple with the implications of Alberta’s renewed push for oil exports and the ongoing impact on their communities and environment.

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.