B.C. Chiefs Vow to Block New Pipeline Agreement Signed Today

UPDATE: First Nations leaders along the northern coast of British Columbia (B.C.) have swiftly condemned a new pipeline agreement signed today, threatening their territories. The memorandum of understanding (MOU) between Alberta Premier Danielle Smith and Prime Minister Mark Carney was finalized this morning in Calgary, paving the way for a controversial bitumen pipeline from the Alberta oilsands to the B.C. coast.

“We will use every tool in our toolbox to ensure that this pipeline does not go ahead,” declared Heiltsuk Nation Chief Marilyn Slett. She emphasized that today’s MOU does not enhance the likelihood of the pipeline becoming a reality. This urgent opposition reflects a broader sentiment among Indigenous communities, who argue that the agreement was reached without adequate consultation.

The Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs (UBCIC), where Slett is a member, expressed strong objections. They stated that the bilateral agreement violates the requirements for free, prior, and informed consent as outlined in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. “The answer is still no and always will be,” affirmed UBCIC Grand Chief Stewart Phillip. His remarks included a staunch opposition to any potential lifting of the crude oil tanker ban in the region.

The MOU hints at possible adjustments to the Oil Tanker Moratorium Act, raising alarms among coastal First Nations. The memory of a devastating spill in 2016, which leaked over 1,000,000 litres of diesel and heavy oils into traditional fishing grounds, remains fresh. Chief Slett warned, “An oil spill could destroy our way of life. We would bear the risk.”

Despite the backlash, Premier Smith acknowledged Indigenous representatives present at the signing, including leaders from Alberta-based First Nations. However, critics pointed out that no representatives from B.C. First Nations were included in the MOU, which raises serious concerns about the legitimacy of Indigenous consultation.

Matthew Wildcat, an associate professor at the University of Alberta, noted that the presence of supportive Indigenous leaders at the announcement does not equate to comprehensive consultation. “They go purposefully seek out nations and Indigenous individuals who are more likely to be in support of a project,” he said, highlighting a tactic used to legitimize controversial initiatives.

The Confederacy of Treaty 8, representing Indigenous rights holders in northern Alberta and parts of B.C., criticized the lack of consultation prior to the MOU. “These matters have direct implications for our lands, our waters, and our Treaty relationship. As the rights holders, we require meaningful engagement before offering public comment,” their statement asserted.

The urgency of this situation is underscored by the fact that many First Nations fear the environmental consequences of the proposed pipeline. Melanie Dene, managing director of Indigenous Climate Action and a member of the Mikisew Cree First Nation, expressed frustration over the lack of inclusion in discussions about economic opportunities tied to the project. “Again, we’re completely left out of those conversations,” she said, emphasizing the need for Indigenous voices in regulatory processes.

As the agreement is set to proceed to the Major Project Office for approval, the implications for Indigenous rights and environmental sustainability loom large. Premier Smith touted the potential for Indigenous co-ownership in the project, while also acknowledging the concerns raised by opposing First Nations.

With tensions rising and opposition mounting, the question remains: what will happen next? As the situation develops, all eyes will be on the responses from First Nations leaders and the federal government. The urgency of their situation highlights the critical need for genuine dialogue and respect for Indigenous rights in the decision-making process surrounding resource development in Canada.