Trump Cancels Biden’s Autopen Orders, Sparks Political Controversy

President Donald Trump has announced the cancellation of all Executive Orders signed by his predecessor, Joe Biden, using an autopen during his presidency. This decision, revealed on Friday, has ignited a political firestorm, with accusations of complicity aimed at the Democratic Party regarding Biden’s mental and physical capabilities throughout his time in office.

Trump has frequently criticized Biden’s reliance on electronically signed documents, despite the fact that he, along with many former presidents, has utilized this method. Traditionally, autopens were employed for routine signatures, with former President Barack Obama being the first to use it for legislative actions, including pardons and commutations while on vacation. In contrast, Trump asserts that he has only employed the autopen for less significant documents.

The controversy deepens when considering the implications of Biden’s autopen signatures. According to reports, the extent of the Democrats’ efforts to manage Biden’s public image raises questions about the authenticity of these signatures. Investigations, including findings from Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson in their book *Original Sin*, have suggested a coordinated attempt by Jill Biden and Biden’s inner circle to shield him from public scrutiny.

Biden’s sporadic public appearances and the physical shielding from media interactions have led to widespread speculation about his condition. Even if Trump’s claims are unfounded, the Democratic Party’s actions during Biden’s presidency have opened the door to scrutiny. The most notable example of Biden’s hand-signed document is the pardon of his son, Hunter Biden, in December 2022, which was part of a series of pardons granted to family members amid ongoing Republican-led investigations into their financial dealings.

As the Biden administration continues to navigate this complex landscape, the question of his cognitive abilities and executive decision-making comes to the forefront. Observers note a marked decline in Biden’s mental acuity, prompting concerns that significant decisions may have been made without his full awareness or consent. This notion is echoed by James Comer, a Republican Congressman, who labeled the use of electronic signatures as potentially illegal, asserting that Biden’s staff “abused the autopen” to enact executive actions lacking proper documentation.

The Oversight Project, a conservative think tank, has also pointed out that many pardons and commutations signed with the autopen occurred while Biden was physically present in Washington, D.C., rather than traveling. Attorney General Pam Bondi has indicated her office is reviewing the implications of Biden’s autopen usage, reflecting a growing interest in the potential legal ramifications.

The unfolding narrative surrounding Biden’s autopen signatures is likely to escalate, drawing more attention from both conservative and liberal media outlets. While conservative platforms are extensively covering Trump’s recent actions, mainstream outlets like The New York Times have provided limited coverage. This discrepancy highlights the broader implications of the ongoing discourse about Biden’s administration and the alleged cover-ups regarding his health.

As political tensions rise, the legitimacy of decisions made under Biden’s presidency, particularly those made using autopen, will remain a contentious issue. The landscape is set for further political maneuvering as both parties grapple with the ramifications of these revelations.