Halton Region Moves to Dismantle Heritage Services, Sparking Concerns

The decision by Halton Region to dismantle its heritage services and transfer ownership of a collection comprising over 30,000 artifacts has sparked significant concern within the local heritage community. The move, which was made public following a closed council session on July 9, 2023, has raised alarms about the future of local history and the preservation of cultural artifacts.

Heritage specialist Vanessa Lio, who previously volunteered with the Halton Region Museum, described the decision as “shocking,” highlighting the potential negative precedent it sets for other municipalities. “I’m fearful of the example and precedent,” Lio stated, emphasizing her worries about the fate of the collection and the implications for local institutions that are already struggling.

The Halton council’s decision to dismantle its heritage services division contradicts its own 2021 master plan. The collection includes a wide range of items such as archival materials, photographs, tools, clothing, and works of art, many of which have no direct connection to Halton. The plan outlines Indigenous consultation for around 20 items believed to be of Indigenous origin, with the Region pledging to adhere to the Canadian Museums Association’s deaccession guidelines.

Local representatives have voiced mixed reactions to the council’s decision. John Challinor, a Milton councillor and president of the Milton Historical Society, acknowledged that this situation has been developing over the past two decades. He pointed out that local interest in heritage services has declined, particularly since the Halton Region Museum closed in 2016. While some critics have raised concerns about the lack of public consultation, Challinor characterized the Region’s approach as cautious and measured.

The plan prioritizes keeping the artifacts within Halton by offering them to local museums, libraries, and historical societies before considering other options, such as public auctions, with any proceeds directed toward heritage initiatives. Challinor noted that the Milton Historical Society has already been approached to accept items that align with its mission, though he has yet to review the inventory.

Despite these reassurances, Lio remains skeptical about the future of the collection. She expressed concern that donors expect their contributions to be preserved and accessible, but there is uncertainty about where the artifacts will ultimately be housed. Her doubts extend to the capabilities of potential local partners to absorb additional artifacts, questioning whether they have the necessary space and resources.

The concerns regarding the closure of the heritage services division have been echoed by archivist Nicholas Moreau, who stated in an email that local history is irreplaceable and that the closure poses a “huge violation of public trust.” He expressed apprehension that some institutions may lack the capacity to manage the responsibility or financial burden associated with the collection.

Lio urged the public to recognize the gravity of the situation, warning that many may not understand the significance of what is being lost until it is too late. “If it’s gone, you’re going to miss it. But you don’t know what you got till it’s gone,” she cautioned. She encouraged community support for local museums and historical societies, emphasizing the need for collective action to protect local heritage.

As Halton Region moves forward with its plans, the outcome remains uncertain. The future of the region’s rich history hangs in the balance, reliant on the actions of local institutions and the community’s commitment to preserving its cultural legacy.