Connect with us

Politics

Vancouver Councillor Proposes Ban on Right Turns at Red Lights

Editorial

Published

on

Vancouver City Councillor Lucy Maloney has introduced a member motion advocating for a ban on right turns at red traffic lights throughout the city. The proposal aims to enhance pedestrian and cyclist safety at intersections, addressing concerns over the potential hazards posed by vehicles making right turns while the light is red.

The motion calls for the City of Vancouver staff to assess city-wide measures that would prohibit right-turn-on-red movements at locations where they conflict with pedestrian safety initiatives or cycling infrastructure. Specifically, the ban would target intersections featuring or planned to include Leading Pedestrian Intervals (LPIs), areas where vehicles turning right cross bike lanes, and intersections with a documented history of pedestrian or cyclist injuries.

If adopted, this initiative could represent one of the most significant reforms to intersection safety in Vancouver in recent years. Maloney, a staunch advocate for cycling and road safety who was elected to council in the April 2025 by-election, cites research indicating that allowing right turns on red lights increases collision rates substantially.

City data reveals that conflicts involving right-turning vehicles are among the leading causes of pedestrian collisions, often occurring when pedestrians are legally crossing with a walk signal. A study conducted by the city in 2015 found that 13 percent of cyclist-driver collisions occurred during right-turn movements.

The provincial government has previously published literature supporting such prohibitions as an effective safety measure. Their March 2018 recommended safe roadway design guide states, “Where Right Turn On Red (RTOR) is permitted, drivers must look for pedestrians crossing from the left and right, for cyclists approaching from the rear, while simultaneously trying to find a gap in the vehicle and cyclist stream crossing the intersection from the left.” The guide argues that prohibiting RTOR simplifies the decision-making process for drivers, thereby reducing the risk of accidents.

Currently, in British Columbia, as well as in much of Canada and the United States, laws allowing right turns on red were implemented in the 1970s. In contrast, many European countries typically prohibit such maneuvers at red signals.

The City of Vancouver has been expanding its use of LPIs, which provide pedestrians a head start before vehicles receive a green light. These measures improve visibility and reinforce pedestrian right-of-way, but their effectiveness hinges on preventing right turns on red during the designated intervals.

Maloney’s proposal aligns with a growing trend of cities implementing similar restrictions. Cities such as Montreal, New York City, and Washington, D.C. have established citywide bans on right turns at red lights. A pilot project in Washington, D.C. in 2018 resulted in significant decreases in conflicts, reporting a 97 percent reduction in vehicle-to-vehicle conflicts and a 92 percent drop in failures to yield to pedestrians.

In addition to Maloney’s motion, fellow city councillor Sean Orr of the COPE party has proposed a separate initiative aimed at measuring vehicle speeds in areas where fatal accidents have occurred. Orr’s program would focus on the most recent fatal crashes, studying approximately 20 sites each year and collecting speed data for at least two days, ideally for an entire week, surrounding the anniversary of each incident. To initiate the program, Orr suggests utilizing provincial grant funding to cover equipment purchases or staff costs.

Both motions by Maloney and Orr are set to be reviewed by the Vancouver City Council next week, marking a critical moment for road safety measures in the city.

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.