Lewis Residents Oppose Weapons Experimentation at Missile Silo

Residents of Lewis, a small town in northern New York, are expressing significant opposition to a proposal that would permit experimentation with military weapons at a former missile silo. The plan, presented by Michael Hopmeier, president of the national security consulting firm Unconventional Concepts, involves a contract with the U.S. government to repurpose the site for military testing.

During a meeting held at the local fire station on Thursday, March 7, 2024, Hopmeier addressed community concerns regarding the proposed modifications. He clarified that the intent is not to create a hazardous environment. “We are not here to cut down trees, we’re not here to create a bombing range, we’re not here to blow things up,” he stated.

Despite Hopmeier’s assurances, residents remain skeptical. The prospect of weapon experimentation in their community has generated anxiety among local inhabitants, who fear potential risks to their safety and the environment. They voiced concerns about the implications of introducing military-grade weaponry into their neighborhood, stressing that this could alter the character and tranquility of their town.

The missile silo, which has been under Hopmeier’s ownership for approximately a decade, is intended for a range of activities under the proposed contract. This includes experimentation with various military devices, particularly focusing on cannon barrels and other advanced weaponry. The plan has raised numerous questions regarding regulatory oversight and community safety measures.

Local authorities are now tasked with balancing national security interests against the concerns of their constituents. The situation has prompted discussions about the need for greater transparency and community engagement in decision-making processes related to military activities in civilian areas.

As residents continue to mobilize against the proposal, they are calling for public meetings to voice their opinions and seek further clarification from both Hopmeier and government representatives. The outcome of this initiative remains uncertain, as the town grapples with the potential consequences of hosting military experimentation in a historically peaceful environment.

The ongoing dialogue reflects broader concerns about military presence in civilian life, raising questions about where the line should be drawn between national security and local community well-being. As the situation develops, both residents and officials will need to navigate the complexities of this proposal to address the myriad of concerns surrounding it.